Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ufuk's avatar

I don’t know what to call this other than a semantic fallacy. You can’t just add “market of” to things like an appendix and have it be treated as a market now, especially to the concept of ideas (unless you believe in intellectual property, which you would be wrong for as ideas are not tangible and exchanged, but copied).

Expand full comment
Joe Potts's avatar

The "market for ideas" is NO MARKET. One does NOT buy, sell, give away, nor own an idea (they're free).

It's a metaphor, and it's false.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...