Free individuals freely compensate people for things they want. That's what got us where we are. The Soviets subsidized sports teams for national glory and they couldn't keep their grocery stores stocked.
Free individuals freely compensate people for things they want. That's what got us where we are. The Soviets subsidized sports teams for national glory and they couldn't keep their grocery stores stocked.
So, let's assume for the sake of argument, soon there will be AI's that are better than humans in everything. Should we compensate the humans, or just let them all die?
Even if we decided to have an AI provided UBI for everyone, it still wouldn't mean we should force people to spend their UBI on tickets to women's sports.
"we as a society should compensate for it"
No way comrade!
Free individuals freely compensate people for things they want. That's what got us where we are. The Soviets subsidized sports teams for national glory and they couldn't keep their grocery stores stocked.
I was hoping for a more rational discussion instead of name calling... Even if we don't agree.
Forcing people to pay for things they don't want because it gives you good feels is not rational.
So, let's assume for the sake of argument, soon there will be AI's that are better than humans in everything. Should we compensate the humans, or just let them all die?
Even if we decided to have an AI provided UBI for everyone, it still wouldn't mean we should force people to spend their UBI on tickets to women's sports.
So you agree with UBI for humans, even though they would be incompetent compared to the AI? Do you see what this implies?