So, let's assume for the sake of argument, soon there will be AI's that are better than humans in everything. Should we compensate the humans, or just let them all die?
So, let's assume for the sake of argument, soon there will be AI's that are better than humans in everything. Should we compensate the humans, or just let them all die?
Even if we decided to have an AI provided UBI for everyone, it still wouldn't mean we should force people to spend their UBI on tickets to women's sports.
So, let's assume for the sake of argument, soon there will be AI's that are better than humans in everything. Should we compensate the humans, or just let them all die?
Even if we decided to have an AI provided UBI for everyone, it still wouldn't mean we should force people to spend their UBI on tickets to women's sports.
So you agree with UBI for humans, even though they would be incompetent compared to the AI? Do you see what this implies?