5 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Jack's avatar

He's pretty clearly saying they factored in inflation when making the odds of the initial bet that way they don't have to do some sort of weird 'true-up' based on CPI at the end or something.

Expand full comment
sriram B's avatar

So it's not an equal odds bet? I think that should have been mentioned in the original post more explicitly. Also, it is better to disentangle the odds from inflation as the odds are supposed to provide an idea about the belief of the bettors.

Expand full comment
Jack's avatar

Don't know what to tell you, it was clear to me and apparently to the bettors.

It wouldn't be that hard to reverse-engineer implied inflation rates and the effective odds of the bet -- either party could have hedged were they so inclined.

Expand full comment
sriram B's avatar

In this case the odds depend on the future inflation, which is what makes it weird. Like if the US undergoes higher than expected inflation within this decade, Matthew loses money even though the bet had nothing to do with the US economy. I'm not sure how you think this isn't weird.

Expand full comment
Jack's avatar

makes perfect sense for a bet that is more likely to be won later into the time window, automatically adjusting the odds depending on when it happens

it is also much simpler to handle logistically which I would guess is the primary reason

Expand full comment