If you could stick Michael Huemer in a room for 12 months to research any subject he hasn't already written a book about, and for him to write a book about it, what would it be?
If you could stick Michael Huemer in a room for 12 months to research any subject he hasn't already written a book about, and for him to write a book about it, what would it be?
I'd have him write a public policy book, where every chapter is modelled after his papers on immigration restrictions and gun control. So there's (a) weak deontology, plus (b) a concise survey of the social science, leading to (c) a moral conclusion.
If you could stick Michael Huemer in a room for 12 months to research any subject he hasn't already written a book about, and for him to write a book about it, what would it be?
I'd have him write a public policy book, where every chapter is modelled after his papers on immigration restrictions and gun control. So there's (a) weak deontology, plus (b) a concise survey of the social science, leading to (c) a moral conclusion.