"“But hostile takeovers are heavily regulated!” you protest? You’re right. But who’s fault is that? Roughly speaking, the same people who lament that “Big corporations can do whatever they want.”"
You make no reference to what the specific regulations are, who passed them, or who lobbied for them.
"“But hostile takeovers are heavily regulated!” you protest? You’re right. But who’s fault is that? Roughly speaking, the same people who lament that “Big corporations can do whatever they want.”"
You make no reference to what the specific regulations are, who passed them, or who lobbied for them.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was the anti-market Left. But I also wouldn't be surprised if it was the allegedly "pro-market" corporations themselves, or a mix of the two.
A group that can be convicted without evidence can be acquitted without evidence.
"“But hostile takeovers are heavily regulated!” you protest? You’re right. But who’s fault is that? Roughly speaking, the same people who lament that “Big corporations can do whatever they want.”"
You make no reference to what the specific regulations are, who passed them, or who lobbied for them.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was the anti-market Left. But I also wouldn't be surprised if it was the allegedly "pro-market" corporations themselves, or a mix of the two.
A group that can be convicted without evidence can be acquitted without evidence.