Does this argument assume people get to stay even if they have no job and are living from crime or government benefits? If not then I don't think the analogy to buying stocks holds. If so, I don't think thats what Brian advocates.
Does this argument assume people get to stay even if they have no job and are living from crime or government benefits? If not then I don't think the analogy to buying stocks holds. If so, I don't think thats what Brian advocates.
Does this argument assume people get to stay even if they have no job and are living from crime or government benefits? If not then I don't think the analogy to buying stocks holds. If so, I don't think thats what Brian advocates.