Incoherent, scientifically illiterate nonsense. Just as "race" doesn't exist (as good science), race denialism is equally bad science. Gene pools matter. Classical liberalism only appeared 1,000 years ago in the outbred gene pool in NW Europe. Inbred gene pools are never classically liberal, with high-social-trust institutions such as fo…
Incoherent, scientifically illiterate nonsense. Just as "race" doesn't exist (as good science), race denialism is equally bad science. Gene pools matter. Classical liberalism only appeared 1,000 years ago in the outbred gene pool in NW Europe. Inbred gene pools are never classically liberal, with high-social-trust institutions such as formal/constitutional law, they are always clannish and low trust.
See Samuel Bowles' 2008 Ulam Lectures, Santa Fe Institute.
Yes, Im a Rand fetishist. Ive grown weary of statistical studies of emotions posing as science.
Have you ever considered science as the product of a focused mind? As bluesman, Johhny Winter almost sang it,"Realitys out there,babe, its sneakin' up on ya Its gonna git ya wherever you go.
>"race" doesn't exist (as good science), race denialism is equally bad science.
If you mess up your mind w/contraadictions, it will respond w/demons.
Materialism is a rationalization of (1) the evasion of the mind, focused or unfocused; and (2) a hidden acceptance of the pre-scientific mind/body spllt. Mystics and materialists each accept and reject different sides of the split. Materialism is science like a whore is a wife.
Everything you have said so far is muddled gibberish and a PROJECTION of your mental dysfunction. Waste of time. You think you understand science, but you obviously don't because you do not appear to be capable of anything other than lazy, slobbery generalizations.
Incoherent, scientifically illiterate nonsense. Just as "race" doesn't exist (as good science), race denialism is equally bad science. Gene pools matter. Classical liberalism only appeared 1,000 years ago in the outbred gene pool in NW Europe. Inbred gene pools are never classically liberal, with high-social-trust institutions such as formal/constitutional law, they are always clannish and low trust.
See Samuel Bowles' 2008 Ulam Lectures, Santa Fe Institute.
Are you a Rand fetishist. or similar?
Yes, Im a Rand fetishist. Ive grown weary of statistical studies of emotions posing as science.
Have you ever considered science as the product of a focused mind? As bluesman, Johhny Winter almost sang it,"Realitys out there,babe, its sneakin' up on ya Its gonna git ya wherever you go.
>"race" doesn't exist (as good science), race denialism is equally bad science.
If you mess up your mind w/contraadictions, it will respond w/demons.
Rand cultists, like all cultists, are sociopathic, emotional manipulators.
Your rationalization of intellectual cowardice as response to social disapproval is noted.
There is EXACTLY NOTHING that you have said that is either "focused" or "scientific".
ZERO.
Troll.
Materialism is a rationalization of (1) the evasion of the mind, focused or unfocused; and (2) a hidden acceptance of the pre-scientific mind/body spllt. Mystics and materialists each accept and reject different sides of the split. Materialism is science like a whore is a wife.
This is simple:
BOTH the pro-race faction AND the anti-race ("race denier") faction are wrong, in different ways, about the science of human population genetics.
Your inability to think coherently, at a basic level, is a strong indicator that you are mentally dysfunctional.
You are a waste of time.
>wrong, in different ways
You evade identifying them, thus impossible to judge your claim.
Everything you have said so far is muddled gibberish and a PROJECTION of your mental dysfunction. Waste of time. You think you understand science, but you obviously don't because you do not appear to be capable of anything other than lazy, slobbery generalizations.
Agreed, in the context of the unfocused mind.