The difficulty for Bryan is that there is no EMPIRICAL evidence that there is either a viable path to implementing his idea nor that it would be a stable equilibrium.
Actual existing political systems have empirically proven their viability as real possibilities. One can debate the merits of them using empirical data.
The difficulty for Bryan is that there is no EMPIRICAL evidence that there is either a viable path to implementing his idea nor that it would be a stable equilibrium.
Actual existing political systems have empirically proven their viability as real possibilities. One can debate the merits of them using empirical data.
That is a very good point. Starting out by trying to convince someone that 10% less government spending would be good is hard enough haha. Obviously there is no way to make headway on anarcho-capitalism if people generally aren’t even sold on the benefits of reducing government influence in general. (I know this debate wasn’t actual about anarchism-capitalism.)
The difficulty for Bryan is that there is no EMPIRICAL evidence that there is either a viable path to implementing his idea nor that it would be a stable equilibrium.
Actual existing political systems have empirically proven their viability as real possibilities. One can debate the merits of them using empirical data.
That is a very good point. Starting out by trying to convince someone that 10% less government spending would be good is hard enough haha. Obviously there is no way to make headway on anarcho-capitalism if people generally aren’t even sold on the benefits of reducing government influence in general. (I know this debate wasn’t actual about anarchism-capitalism.)