Finally listened to the debate. I take it back. Sehon is not a very sophisticated thinker in my view. He just takes for granted a lot of statist dogma. True, if you believe all his premises, his conclusion follows. But he doesn’t present convincing arguments for those premises.
Finally listened to the debate. I take it back. Sehon is not a very sophisticated thinker in my view. He just takes for granted a lot of statist dogma. True, if you believe all his premises, his conclusion follows. But he doesn’t present convincing arguments for those premises.
Finally listened to the debate. I take it back. Sehon is not a very sophisticated thinker in my view. He just takes for granted a lot of statist dogma. True, if you believe all his premises, his conclusion follows. But he doesn’t present convincing arguments for those premises.