Thanks for reading her. It does not matter much who said so - as the claims are absurd, no matter who said them + Lewis claims that a) she said so + b) that this somehow shows: Caplan is wrong somehow ... his pro-market-stance makes him an object of hatred to her ... because she and many are sure: pro-market is kinda white supremacy ... …
Thanks for reading her. It does not matter much who said so - as the claims are absurd, no matter who said them + Lewis claims that a) she said so + b) that this somehow shows: Caplan is wrong somehow ... his pro-market-stance makes him an object of hatred to her ... because she and many are sure: pro-market is kinda white supremacy ... so he should stop saying the left is anti-market ... . I really can not see Lewis' point there. I guess I see the points he made before, or 85% of them. :) Thinking about it, the deeper insight of Caplan's half-joking rule seems to me: Do not assume the "right" to be pro-market, just because the "left" is not.
Thanks for reading her. It does not matter much who said so - as the claims are absurd, no matter who said them + Lewis claims that a) she said so + b) that this somehow shows: Caplan is wrong somehow ... his pro-market-stance makes him an object of hatred to her ... because she and many are sure: pro-market is kinda white supremacy ... so he should stop saying the left is anti-market ... . I really can not see Lewis' point there. I guess I see the points he made before, or 85% of them. :) Thinking about it, the deeper insight of Caplan's half-joking rule seems to me: Do not assume the "right" to be pro-market, just because the "left" is not.