Conservative men who hunt and fish and oodles of women friends. That's not it. But I do think there is something so incredibly shameless about posting on anti-feminism without but one invited woman to comment in sight. Or do you have woman friends who could read the comment section under the "anti-feminism" post and not find it so full o…
Conservative men who hunt and fish and oodles of women friends. That's not it. But I do think there is something so incredibly shameless about posting on anti-feminism without but one invited woman to comment in sight. Or do you have woman friends who could read the comment section under the "anti-feminism" post and not find it so full of misogyny that it could be placed in a history text right now, as an example of it? But yes, I also know men are not supportive of your reactionary anti-feminism, and I know what they say about even interacting with people who have these views. (Don't and Why would you?) Maybe you guys could do a survey of fathers, see if they feel differently.
This mere days after Bryan literally invited a feminist woman to reply to a post of his on his own blog. I honestly can't even relate to having such antipathy toward people you disagree with you on politics that you avoid interacting with them, but whatever, it's your life.
I'm really impressed by the way you've managed to respond to a post about Bayesian updating on personal experiences with someone with a feminist screed writ small. There's a kind of halo effect when I open a substack like this one where my willingness to be as open minded as possible sometimes extends to the comment section as well. This applied in your case, and I am grateful for your
comment. I am reminded to ask myself how often my own petty monomanias make me boring and narrow in discourse. Quite often, I'm afraid. Glad you're here.
Conservative men who hunt and fish and oodles of women friends. That's not it. But I do think there is something so incredibly shameless about posting on anti-feminism without but one invited woman to comment in sight. Or do you have woman friends who could read the comment section under the "anti-feminism" post and not find it so full of misogyny that it could be placed in a history text right now, as an example of it? But yes, I also know men are not supportive of your reactionary anti-feminism, and I know what they say about even interacting with people who have these views. (Don't and Why would you?) Maybe you guys could do a survey of fathers, see if they feel differently.
This mere days after Bryan literally invited a feminist woman to reply to a post of his on his own blog. I honestly can't even relate to having such antipathy toward people you disagree with you on politics that you avoid interacting with them, but whatever, it's your life.
I'm really impressed by the way you've managed to respond to a post about Bayesian updating on personal experiences with someone with a feminist screed writ small. There's a kind of halo effect when I open a substack like this one where my willingness to be as open minded as possible sometimes extends to the comment section as well. This applied in your case, and I am grateful for your
comment. I am reminded to ask myself how often my own petty monomanias make me boring and narrow in discourse. Quite often, I'm afraid. Glad you're here.