My take on the article is that Caplan has defined merit as "capable of living in the US without state assistance" while "working for willing employers, renting from willing landlords, and shopping from willing merchants". By this standard even many "unskilled" workers would have merit.
My take on the article is that Caplan has defined merit as "capable of living in the US without state assistance" while "working for willing employers, renting from willing landlords, and shopping from willing merchants". By this standard even many "unskilled" workers would have merit.
My take on the article is that Caplan has defined merit as "capable of living in the US without state assistance" while "working for willing employers, renting from willing landlords, and shopping from willing merchants". By this standard even many "unskilled" workers would have merit.
Thanks, that makes sense.